|
Only Since World War II has the term
Southeast Asia been used to describe the area to the east of India and to the
south of China, which includes the Indo-Chinese Peninsula, the Malay Archipelago
and the Philippines, roughly forming a circle from Burma through Indonesia to
Vietnam. Before the term Southeast Asia became common usage, the region was
often described as Further or Greater India, and it was common to describe the
Indonesian region or Malay Archipelago as the East Indies. The reason may be
found in the fact that, prior to Western dominance, Southeast Asia was closely
allied to India culturally and commercially. The history of Indian expansion
covers a period of more than fifteen hundred years.
This region was broadly referred to by
ancient Indians as Suvarnabhumi (the Land of Gold) or Suvarnadvipa (the Island
of Gold), although scholars dispute its exact definition. Sometimes the term is
interpreted to mean only Indonesia or Sumatra. Arab writers such as Al Biruni
testify that Indians called the whole Southeast region Suwarndib (Suvarnadvipa).
Hellenistic geographers knew the area as the Golden Ghersonese. The Chinese
called it Kin-Lin; Kin means gold. During the last two thousand years, this
region has come under the influence of practically all the major civilizations
of the world: Indian, Chinese, Islamic, and Western. Of these, Indian culture
appears to have blended best with the indigenous culture.
The name Java comes from the Sanskrit Jawadwip, which means a (dvip)
island (yawa) shaped like a barley corn. The Vedic Indians must have charted
Java, Yawadvip, thousands of years ago because Yawadvip is mentioned in India's
earliest epic, the Ramayana. The Ramayana reveals some knowledge
of the eastern regions beyond seas; for instance Sugriva dispatched his men to
Yavadvipa, the island of Java, in search of Sita. It speaks of Burma
as the land of silver mines. The Agni Purana, along with many other Puranas,
calls India
proper as Jambudvipa as distinguished from Dvipantara or India of the islands or
overseas India. Towards the end of
the fifth century, Aryabhatta, the Indian astronomer, wrote that when the sun
rose in Ceylon it was midday in Yavakoti (Java) and midnight in the Roman land.
In the Surya Siddhanta reference is also made to the Nagari Yavakoti with golden
walls and gates.
Seldom has the world seen such a protracted and pervasive
cultural diffusion. It stands a monument to the vitality and magnetism of Indian
civilization.
     
Suvarnabhumi: Asianization of Indian Culture
India has always given a
great deal more than she has received. Civilization as we know today would not
exist without India.
Indianization
of Asia was entirely peaceful, never resorting to physical force or coercion to
subvert local cultures or identities, or to engage in economic or political
exploitation of the host cultures and societies. Its worldviews were based on
compassion and mutual exchange, and not on the principle of conquest and
domination.
"The
unique feature of India's contacts and relationship with other countries and
peoples of the world is that the cultural expansion was never confused with
colonial domination and commercial dynamism far less economic exploitation.
That culture can advance without political motives, that trade can proceed
without imperialist designs, settlements can take place without colonial
excesses and that literature, religion and language can be transported without
xenophobia, jingoism and race complexes are amply evidenced from the history of
India's contact with her neighbors...Thus although a considerable part of
central and south-eastern Asia became flourishing centers of Indian culture,
they were seldom subjects to the regime of any Indian king or conquerors and
hardly witnessed the horrors and havocs of any Indian military campaign. They
were perfectly free, politically and economically and their people representing
an integration of Indian and indigenous elements had no links with any Indian
state and looked upon India as a holy land rather than a motherland – a land
of pilgrimage and not an area of jurisdiction."
(source:
Greater
India - By Arun Bhattacharjee -
Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited, 1981, New Delhi p. 2
- 3 and Indian
Culture over the World - By S V Shevade p.
91 and The
Soul of India - By Satyavrata R Patel p. 30 and Geopolitics
and Sanskrit phobia
-
By Rajiv Malhotra -
sulekha.com).
Sir Charles
Norton Edgcumbe Eliot
(1862-1931) British diplomat and colonial administrator, in his book, Hinduism and Buddhism,
vol. I, p.12. says:
"In
Eastern Asia the influence of India has been notable in extent, strength, and
duration."
"Scant justice is done to India's position
in the world by those European histories which recount the exploits of her
invaders and leave the impression that her own people were a feeble dreamy folk,
surrendered from the rest of mankind by their seas and mountain frontiers. Such
a picture takes no account of the intellectual conquests of the Hindus."
Even their political conquests were not contemptible, and are remarkable for
the distance, if not the extent, of the territories occupied...But
such military or commercial invasions are insignificant compared with the spread
of Indian thought." The south-eastern region of Asia
both mainland and Archipelago - owed its civilization almost entirely to India.
In Ceylon, Burma, Siam, Cambodia, Champa, and Java, religion, art, the alphabet,
literature, as well as whatever science and political organization existed, were
the direct gift of Hindus, whether Brahmin or Buddhists, and much the same may
be said of Tibet, whence the wilder Mongols took as much Indian civilization as
they could stomach."
(source: Eminent
Orientalists: Indian European American - Asian Educational
Services. p. 369).
French
scholar, Sylvain
Levi (1863-1935) Orientalist who wrote on Eastern religion,
literature, and history. Levi
was appointed a lecturer at the school of higher studies
in Paris (1886), he taught Sanskrit at the Sorbonne (1889-94) and wrote his
doctoral dissertation, Le Théâtre indien ("The Indian
Theatre"). In L'Inde
et le monde ("India and the World"), he discussed India's role
among nations. He
writes:
"From Persia to the Chinese Sea,
from the icy regions of Siberia to the islands of Java and Borneo, from Oceania
to Socotra, India has propagated her beliefs, her tales and her civilization.
She has left indelible imprints on one-fourth of the human race in the course of
a long succession of centuries. She has the right to reclaim in universal
history the rank that ignorance has refused her for a long time and to hold her
place amongst the great nations summarizing and symbolizing the spirit of
Humanity."
(source: Discovery of India - By
Jawaharlal
Nehru. p. 200 -210). Refer
to India
once ruled the Americas! – By Gene D Matlock
Heinrich
Zimmer (1890-1943) the great German
Indologist, in the noblest of
many books, in his book, Asia before Europe: Economy
and Civilization of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 1750,
writes of the Indian cultural world:
“Each of the colonial cultures and art styles of Ceylon,
Indonesia, and Further India, as well as that of Tibet, China, Korea and Japan,
took over in a worthy way the Indian heritage, giving to it an original and
happy local application. Out of various ethnological and biological requirements
self-contained styles were formed that were the peers in originality, nobility
and delicacy of the Indian.”
India remains “the creative
hearth”: Indeed, whenever the incredible brightness of the spiritual, the
balanced repose of the dynamic, or the brilliant power of the triumphantly
omnipotent are made effectively manifestation in Oriental art, an Indian model
is not far to seek.”
(source: Under Western Eyes
- By Balachandra Rajan p. 37 – 38).

Greater India: The expansion of Indian
culture and influence both in Central Asia and the South East towards the
countries and islands of the Pacific is one of the momentous factors of world
history.
(image source: A Survey of Indian History
- By Sardar
Kavalam Madhava Panikkar).
***
Wilhelm Von
Humboldt (1767-1835) German Indologist, Prussian minister of education, a brilliant linguist and
the founder of the science of general linguistics.
He wrote:
"The Relation between India and
Java"; in it the author discusses the cultural influence India extended on
countries further east. Humboldt showed that the Kawi
language is Javanese and contains a number of Sanskrit loan words which prove
the literary and political superiority of the Hindus.
The historical
background is the emigration of Brahmins, who brought the Mahabharata, the
Ramayana and other works of Sanskrit literature. He showed that no Prakrit words
are found in Old Javanese and he deduced from this that the Indian immigrants
must have come to Java at a time when the more recent Indian languages had not
yet separated from Sanskrit."
(source: German
Indologists: Biographies of Scholars in Indian Studies writing in German
- By Valentine Stache-Rosen. p 5 - 6).
B G Gokhale ( ? ) rightly
observes:
“Looking at the cultures of the peoples of Asia in general and south
east Asia in particular, the awareness grows upon us that what we see in Burma
or Siam or Indonesia is but an extension of Indian culture – they could be
legitimately called a Greater India.”
(source:
Greater
India - By Arun Bhattacharjee -
Munshiram
Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited, 1981, New Delhi p. 1 - 20).
Sardar
Kavalam Madhava Panikkar (1896-1963) Indian historian, in his
book A Survey of Indian History, was the
most impressive in depicting how South India’s expansion into “further
India” was achieved by the very sea power that ten centuries later was to open
India to colonization by the West:
"From the first
century A.D we witness the strange fact of Hindu or Hinduised kingdoms in
Annam
, Cochin-China and the islands of the Pacific. The
Ramayana knew of Java and
Sumatra
. Communication by sea between the ports of
South India
and the islands of the Pacific was well established many centuries before the
Christian era."
(source: A Survey of Indian History
- By Sardar
Kavalam Madhava Panikkar p.
68 - 69).
“At the end of the fifth century the area of the Mekong
valley, Malaya and the Indonesian islands were dotted with Hindu principalities
some of which, like the kingdom of Funan, had attained considerable importance
and prosperity. This was the formative period. Hindu culture and organization
had been established on a firm basis, and the local population – at least the
higher strata – assimilated with the Indian emigrants and colonists. The next
five centuries witness a great flowering of Indian culture in these areas which
properly belong to Indian history, because at least till the twelfth century,
these people considered themselves as integrally belonging to the Indian
world.”
"The
early inscriptions are in classical Sanskrit, full of allusions to ancient
India..."Kambuja was ardently Hindu till the middle of the seventh century
when Buddhism is first alluded to. The two religions co-existed as in India,
though till the very end Hinduism continued predominant."
(source: Under Western Eyes - By Balachandra
Rajan p. 37 – 38).
Suharto
Sukarno (1901- 1970) Indonesian nationalist
leader and the first President of Indonesia. He helped the country win its
independence from the Netherlands. He
echoed the same sentiments.
In a special article in The Hindu on 4 January 1946,
Sukarno wrote:
"In
the veins of every one of my people flows the blood of Indian ancestors and the
culture that we possess is steeped through and through with Indian influences.
Two thousand years ago people from your country came to Jawadvipa
and Suvarnadvipa in
the spirit of brotherly love.
"They gave the initiative to found powerful
kingdoms such as those of Sri Vijaya, Mataram and
Majapahit. We then learnt to worship the very Gods
that you now worship still and we fashioned a culture that even today is largely
identical with your own. Later, we turned to Islam: but that religion too was
brought by people coming from both sides of India."
(source:
Prospects
for a Bay of Bengal community - By V. Suryanarayan).
For more
refer to chapter on Glimpses
XV and Sacred
Angkor.
Norodom
Sihanouk, Head of
the State of the Royal Government of Cambodia
(1954-1970 and, again, since 1993) had on the occasion of the inauguration of
the Jawaharlal Nehru Boulevard in
Phnom Penh, on 10 May 1955, traced the cultural evolution in Southeast Asia to
the pervasive Indian cultural influence:
“When
we refer to thousand year old ties which unite us with India, it is not at all a
hyperbole. "
"In fact, it was about 2000 years ago that the first navigators,
Indian merchants and Brahmins brought to our ancestors their gods, their
techniques, their organization. Briefly
India was for us what Greece was to Latin Orient."
(source: The
Fossilized Indian Culture of Southeast Asia - By Y Yagama Reddy).
Sir Marc Aurel
Stein (1862-1943) a Hungarian and author of several books including Ra`jatarangini:
a chronicle of the kings of Kashmir and Innermost
Asia : detailed report of explorations in Central Asia, Kan-su, and Eastern Iran
carried out and described under the orders of H.M. Indian Government, whose
valuable researches have added greatly to our knowledge of Greater India.
He
remarks:
"The vast extent of Indian cultural influences, from Central Asia in the
North to tropical Indonesia in the South, and from the Borderlands of Persia to
China and Japan, has shown that ancient India was a radiating center of a
civilization, which by its religious thought, its art and literature, was
destined to leave its deep mark on the races wholly diverse and scattered over
the greater part of Asia."
(source: The
Vision of India - By Sisir Kumar Mitra p. 178 and Main
Currents of Indian Culture - By S. Natarajan p. 50).
Will
Durant (1885-1981) American historian, would like the West
to learn from India, tolerance and gentleness and love for all living things.
He
has observed:
"Indian
art had accompanied Indian religion across straits and frontiers into Sri Lanka,
Java, Cambodia, Siam, Burma, Tibet, Khotan, Turkestan, Mongolia, China, Korea
and Japan;
“in
Asia all roads lead from India.”
(source: Story
of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage - By Will
Durant MJF Books. 1935. p. 605).
For
more refer to chapter on Sacred
Angkor,
Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XV.
Reginald Le May ( ? )
author
of The
culture of South-East Asia;: The heritage of India,
observed:
“Indian art and culture seem naturally to have exercised an
extraordinary art fascination over the indigenous peoples of all these
territories, no doubt, owing to the attractions offered by Buddhism and
Hinduism, while Chinese art, not bearing any particular religious message,
apparently made but little impression inspite of the fact that they Chinese, too
sailed the southern seas in search of trade from very early time.”
He
wrote:
“The beginnings of Indian colonization
overseas eastward go back a very long way in time and it is almost certain that
the results seen today were, in the main, not achieved by military expeditions,
but by peaceful trading and religious teaching – and thereby all the more
permanent.”
(source:
Greater
India - By Arun Bhattacharjee -
Munshiram
Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited, 1981, New Delhi p. 1 - 20).
Introduction
Countries
Vietnam, Indonesia Java,
Sumatra,
Borneo,
Bali,
Burma,
Sri
Lanka,
Thailand,
Cambodia,
Malaya,
Philippines,
Japan, Korea,
Nepal,
Tibet, and Russia. For China
- refer to chapter India and
China.
Conclusion
Articles

Introduction:
India is a country of temples without
equal but there is a certain irony in that one of the largest and most dramatic
monuments to Hinduism rests not in India but thousands of miles away from the
subcontinent amid the ruins of a metropolis hidden in the jungles of Cambodia
(formerly known as Kamboja). One of the largest cities of the ancient world,
Angkor was built by King Suryavarnam II to honor Lord Vishnu, it is even larger
than the Vatican. To know and understand India one has to
travel far in time and space, to forget for a while her present condition, and
to have glimpses of what she was and what she did.
(source: Eastern Wisdom:
The Philosophies and Rituals of the East - By M. Jordan
p. 52).
Henri
Mouhot (1826 -1861) a French naturalist and explorer, who had gone
to South-east Asia in the late 1850's and succumbed to fever there in 1861.
Mesmerized by what he saw at the temple of Angkor Vat, Mouhot in lyrical descriptions
said:
"At the sight of this temple, one feels one's spirit crushed, one's imagination
surpassed. One looks, one admires, and, seized with respect, one is silent. For where are
the words to praise a work of art that may not have its equal anywhere on the globe? ...
What genius this Michalangelo of the East had, that he was capable of concaving such a
work.''
(source: Le Tour du Monde, 2-1863-299).
He said: "See Angkor and Die."
"What strikes the observer with
not less admiration than the grandeur, regularity, and beauty of these majestic
buildings, is the immense size and prodigious number of the blocks of stone of
which they are constructed. In this temple alone are as many as 1532 columns. What
means of transport, what a multitude of workmen, must this have required, seeing
that the mountain out of which the stone was hewn is thirty miles
distant!...."
(source: Angkor:
Heart of an Asian Empire - By Bruno Dagens p. 140-141).
"It is
grander than anything left to us by Greece or Rome." "To obtain any
idea of its splendor on one must imagine the most beautiful creations of
architecture transported into depths of the forests in one of the more remote
countries in the world."
Mahout recorded excitedly in his
diary for January 1860 after gazing on the 200-ft temple of Angkor Vat.
(source: The
World's Last Mysteries - Readers
Digest ASIN 089577044X p.
243).
At Ongcor, there are ...ruins of
such grandeur... that, at the first view, one is filled with profound
admiration, and cannot but ask what has become of this powerful race, so
civilized, so enlightened, the authors of these gigantic works?
(source: In
Mouhot's Footsteps ).
According to historian A.
L. Basham, "The whole of South-East Asia received most of its
culture from India. Early in the 5th B.C. century colonists from Western India
settled in Lanka. The Indian 'colonies' were peaceful ones, and the Indianized
chieftains who had learnt what India had to teach them."
(source: The
Wonder That Was India - By A L Basham p. 485).
Henri
Mahout could hardly believe his eyes in 1860.
He wrote of
"ruins of such
grandeur, remains of structures that must have been raised at such an immense
cost of labor, that, at the first view, one is filled with profound
admiration....One of these temples - a rival to that of Soloman, and erected by
some ancient Michael Angleo - might take an honorable place besides our most
beautiful buildings. It is grander than anything left to us by Greece and Rome,
and presents a sad contrast to the state of barbarism in which the nation in now
plunged."
To Mahout, those "prodigious works" were nothing
short of astounding.
(source: Splendors
of the Past: Lost Cities of the Ancient World
- National Geographic Society. p. 186).
Philip S. Rawson
writes in his book The
Art of South East Asia:
"The culture
of India has been one of the world's most powerful civilizing forces. Countries
of the Far East, including China, Korea, Japan, Tibet and Mongolia owe much of
what is best in their own cultures to the inspiration of ideas imported from
India. The West, too, has its own debts." But the members of that circle of
civilizations beyond Burma scattered around the Gulf of Siam and the Java Sea,
virtually owe their very existence to the creative influence of Indian ideas...
No conquest or invasion, no forced conversion imposed them. They were adopted
because people saw that they were good and that they could use them..."
"To
know Indian art in India alone,' says Sir
John Marshall, 'is to know but half its story. To apprehend it to the
full, we must follow it to central Asia, China and Japan; we must watch it
assuming new forms and breaking into new beauties as it spreads over Tibet and
Burma and Siam; we must gaze in awe at the unexpected
grandeur of its creations in Cambodia and Java."
(source: Discovery of India - By
Jawaharlal
Nehru. p. 200 -210). For
more refer to chapter on Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XV.
Will
Durant (1885-1981) American
historian, would like the West to learn from India, tolerance and gentleness and
love for all living things.
He
has observed:
“Angkor
wat is a masterpiece equal to the finest architectural achievements of the
Egyptians, the Greeks, or the cathedral builders of Europe. An enormous moat,
twelve miles in length, surrounds the temple; over the moat runs a paved bridge
guarded by dissuasive Nagas in stone; then an ornate enclosing wall; then
spacious galleries, whose reliefs tell again the tales of the Mahabharata and
the Ramayana; then the stately edifice itself, rising upon a broad base, by
level after level of a terraced pyramid, to the sanctuary of the God, two
hundred feet high."
"Here
magnitude does not detract from beauty, but helps it to an imposing magnificence
that startles the Western mind into some weak realization of the ancient
grandeur once possessed by Oriental civilization."
(source: Story
of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage - By Will
Durant MJF Books. 1935. p. 605).

Hindu Trinity or Trimurti:
Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva
"India
left the indelible impress of her high culture, not only upon religion, but also
upon art, and literature, in a word, all the higher things of spirit."
For
more refer to chapters on Sacred
Angkor
and Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XIX.
***
M. Rene Grousset,
(1885-1952) French art historian, says: "In the high plateau of eastern
Iran, in the oases of Serindia, in the arid wastes of Tibet, Mongolia, and
Manchuria, in the ancient civilized lands of China and Japan, in the lands of
the primitive Mons and Khmers and other tribes of Indo-China, in the countries
of the Malaya-Polynesians, in Indonesia and Malay, India
left the indelible impress of her high culture, not only upon religion, but also
upon art, and literature, in a word, all the higher things of spirit."
"There is an obstinate
prejudice thanks to which India is constantly represented as having lived, as it
were, hermetically sealed up in its age-old civilization, apart from the rest of
Asia. Nothing could be more exaggerated. During the first eight centuries of our
era, so far as religion and art are concerned, central Asia was a sort of Indian
colony. It is often forgotten that in the early Middle
Ages there existed a "Greater India," a vast Indian empire.
A man coming from the Ganges or the Deccan to Southeast Asia felt as much at
home there as in his own native land. In those days the Indian Ocean really
deserved its name."
(source: Civilizations
of the East - By Rene Grousset
Vol. II, Chapter - Farther India and the Malay Archipelago p. 275 -343).
"Indian
art in Java," adds Dr. Ernest Binfield
Havell, "has
a character of its own which distinguishes it from that of the continent from
whence it came. There runs through both the same strain of deep serenity, but in
the divine ideal of Java we lose the austere feeling which characterizes the
Hindu sculpture of Elephanta and Mamallapuram."
(source: The
Ideals of Indian Art - By Dr.
Ernest Binfield Havell p.169
Discovery of India - By
Jawaharlal
Nehru. p. 214).
Rabindranath Tagore has
said: "To know my country one has to travel to that age, when she realized
her soul and thus transcended her physical boundaries when she revealed her
being in a radiant magnanimity which illumined the eastern horizon, making her
recognized as their own by those in alien shores who were awakened into a
surprise of life."
Jawaharlal Nehru
has written: "For it was India that
functioned here and exhibited her vitality and genius in a variety of ways.
We see her bubbling over with energy and spreading out far and wide, carrying
not only her thought but her other ideals, her art, her trade, her language and
literature and her methods of government. She was not stagnant, or standing
aloof, or isolated and cut off by mountain and sea. Her people crossed those
high mountains and and perilous seas and built up, as (French art historian) Rene
Grousset says, ' a Greater India politically as little organized as
Greater Greece, but morally equally harmonious."
(source: The
Discovery of India - By Jawaharlal Nehru
p.207).
Jawaharlal Nehru
has lamented: "How few of us know of these great achievements of our past,
how few realize that if India was great in thought and philosophy, she was
equally great in action. Most westerners still imagine ancient history is
largely concerned with the Mediterranean countries, and medieval and modern
history is dominated by the quarrelsome little continent of Europe."
According to Indian historian, Dr.
K. P. Jayaswal, "Further India was
recognized as part of India in the Bharasiva-Vakataka period. In the Matsya
Purana, for the first time we find that
recognition. Between the Himavat and the Sea Bharatvarsha stands, but it covers
a larger area on account of Indians living in eight more islands (Dvipas). All
these Dvipas were to the east. The Malaya Peninsula was well-known to Indians at
the time, a fact evidenced by an inscription of the 4th century A.D. on a pillar
in the present district of Wellesley. Burma was
known as Indradvipa.
Ceylon was known as Lanka-Dvipa or Tamraparni. Similarly, Cambodia, Nicobar, Sumatra, Java and
Borneo were also known."
The Agni Purana, along with many other
Puranas, calls India
proper as Jambudvipa as distinguished from Dvipantara or India of the islands or
overseas India. Ancient Indians who explored the globe in times immemorial
had a three-fold motto expressed in the terms "Charaiveti" (Let
us move on and on), 'Krunvanto Viswam Aryan' (Let us make all people civilized,
well-behaved, dutiful, god-fearing, noble, educated etc.) and 'Wasudhaiva-Kutumbakam
(the whole world is one entity, one family).
A
Sanskrit-Chinese dictionary compiled in Central Asia in the seventh and eighth
centuries calls the countries situated in the Southern Seas as Jipattala
which Sylvain Levi
interprets as the Indian archipelago and the neighboring islands. These two
Indias were called by the name of Bharatavarsha
which included the nine islands
of Dvipantara-Bharata,
each separated from the other by sea. The names of those
islands were Indra-dvipa, Kaseru, Tamravarna, Gabhastiman, Nagadvipa, Saumya,
Gandharva and Varuna.
Masudi, born in Baghdad, the Arab geographer, historian and philosopher,
states in his work called Muruj adh-Dhahab or 'Meadows of Gold' written in 942 A.D. that India in
those days "extended over sea and land and bordered on the country called
Zabag (Sumatra or Greater Java) ruled by the king of these islands."
Professor Sylvain Levi
has shown from references in the Ramayana, Mahabharata,
Mahaniddesa, and Brihat-Katha that
the products of Burma and Malaya Peninsula were known to Indian merchants and
sailors, and also some of its ports such as Suvarnakudya, Suvarnabhumi, Takkolam,
Tamlin and Javam from at least first century A.D.
The
Periplus of the Erythrean Sea written by a
Greek sailor of Egypt in the first century A.D. mentions many ports of India
then existing on its Western and Eastern coasts. Ptolemy
in his Geography written in the second century A.D. refers to the ports of
Malaya Peninsula, Java, and Sumatra and the Indian port of Palura from which
voyages were directly made to Malaya Peninsula. Ptolemy's reference in the
second century to Iabadiou certainly represents the Prakrit from of the
Sanskrit Yavadvipa.
Indian culture flourished, reaching islands as far as Borneo and Bali. Some of
it survives even today, evident from the quaint proto-Sanskritic names that
still prevail in Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia and Indonesia. Borneo's capital, Bandar
Seri Begawan is a colloquialisation of Sri Bhagwan, Bali's
headquarters, Jeyapora, is nothing but
Jaipur, localised, just as Aranya Prathet in
Thailand is simply the jungle province or Aranya Pradesh. Fortunately, much of
the structure of the gigantic temple city of Angkor Vat has survived the ravages
of the Khmer Rouge, while Borobudur in Java still shines in resplendent glory.
"A
Tamil inscription found in Thailand, at the site of Takua Pa, testifies to
southeast Asia commerce with the Pallava region. A poem written by the 8th
century Vaishnava saint, Tirumangai, speaks
of ports where "ships rode at anchor, bent to the
point of breaking, laden as they were with wealth, with big-trunked elephants,
and with mountains of gems of nine varieties."
(source: Indian Art
- By Vidya Dehejia p.
186).
Names
like Indo-China. Further India, Insulindia, Indonesia, etc., which are applied
to various parts of South East Asia and the Far East are as significant as 'Ser-Inida.'
This region is geographically an extension of India and Ptolemy
rightly calls it 'Trans-Gangetic India.'
(source:
Cultural
Heritage of Ancient India - By Sachindra Kumar Maity p.121). For
a virtual tour of extensive art from Southeast Asia, visit Museum
Guimet).
The
names that were given to these settlements were old Indian names. Thus Cambodia,
as it is known now, was called Kambhoja,
which was a well-known town in ancient India, as was Gandhara
in (present day Afghanistan). (Please refer to Glimpses
II for information on Afghanistan)
What led to these extraordinary expeditions across perilous seas and what was
the tremendous urge behind them?
According to historian, Dr.
R. C. Majumdar (1888
- 1980), has pointed out that:
"If
literature can be regarded as a fair reflex of the popular mind, trade and
commerce must have been a supreme passion in India in the centuries immediately
preceding and following the Christian era."
All this indicates an expanding
economy and a constant search for distant markets. "The
military conquest of these early Indians colonists are important as throwing
light on certain aspects of the Indian character and genius which have hitherto
not been appreciated. But far more important is the rich civilization they built
up in their colonies and settlements and which endured for over a thousand
years. It is not known precisely when contact
began between India and Southeast Asia. There is enough references in Indian
books, accounts of Arab travelers, Chinese historical accounts, old
inscriptions, as well as the magnificent ruins of ancient monuments, like Angkor
and Borobudur. The old stories in Sanskrit
contain many accounts of perilous sea voyages and of shipwrecks. Both
Greek and Arab accounts show that there was regular maritime intercourse between
India and the Far East at least as early as the first century B.C.
(source: The
Discovery of India - By Jawaharlal Nehru p.200 -202).
India's Moonlight
Civilization
Amaury de Riencourt
(1918 - ) was born in Orleans, France. He
received his B.A. from the Sorbonne and his M.A. from the University of Algiers.
He is author of several books including The
American empire and The Soul of India,
wrote:
"The brightest sun shining over Southeast Asia in the first
centuries A.D. was Indian Civilization. Waves of Indian colonists, traders,
soldiers, Brahmins and Buddhist beat upon one Southeast shore after another.
Great military power based on superior technical knowledge, flourishing trade
fostered by the remarkable increase in maritime exchanges between India and
these areas, the vast cultural superiority of the Indians, everything conspired
to heighten the impact of the Indian Civilization on the Southeast Asian. Passenger
ships plied regularly between the Ganges, Ceylon and Malaya in the middle of the
first millennium A.D. Indian settlers from Gujarat and Kalinga colonized Java,
for instance, while others set out for Burma or Cambodia. Old
Indian books – the Kathasagara, the Jatakas and others – refer to these
wondorous regions that set the imagination of civilized Indians on fire, to
Suvarnabhumi, the fabulous “Land of Gold.” On the whole, the Indianization
of Southeast Asia proceeded peacefully. Local chiefs and petty chieftains were
admitted into the caste structure as Ksatriyas through a ritual known as
vratyastoma, performed by an Indian Brahmin. All
over Southeast Asia tremendous ruins are strewn, testifying to the immense
influence of Indian Civilization. "
Indian
Civilization prevailed over an immense area stretching from Afghanistan to the
Pacific, including most of what is known today as Southeast Asia.
Passenger ships plied regularly between the Ganges, Sri Lanka and Malaya in the
middle of the first millennium A.D. Indian settlers from Gujarat and Kalinga (Orissa)
colonized Java, for instance, while others set out for Burma or Cambodia. Old
Indian books - the Kathasaritsagara, the Jatakas and others -refer to these
wondrous regions that set the imaginations of civilized Indians on fire, to
Suvarnabhumi, the fabulous "Land of Gold" as Southeast Asia was then
known. And all over Southeast Asia tremendous ruins are strewn, testifying to
the immense influence of Indian Civilization. Side by side, the life history of
Gautama Buddha carved delicately in stone continues the bas-reliefs depicting
the legendary tales of Krishna, Vishnu and Rama. Moonlight
Civilization glittered in all their magnificence, reflecting Indian Civilization
at a time when it had been dealt a crippling blow at home, in India, after the
Mohammedans arrived.
Everywhere,
Indian influence prevailed over the Chinese, and for evident reasons: an
undoubted cultural superiority owing to much greater philosophic and religious
insight. Indian Civilization respected the political autonomy of its
colonies and the cultural freedom of all its units, and, on the whole, worked
through peaceful penetration. The Chinese, on the other hand, proceeded by
conquest, assimilation and absorption into all encompassing Chinese
Civilization.
(source: The
Soul of India - By Amaury de
Riencourt ISBN 0907855032 p. 157-162).
G
E Geraini commenting on Researches on Ptolemy’s Geography rightly observes:
“From the Brahmaputra and Manipur to the Tonkin Gulf
we can trace a continuous string of petty states ruled by those scions of the
Kshatriya race, using the Sanskrit or the Pali language in official documents
and inscriptions, building temples and other monuments of the Hindu style and
employing Brahmin priest at the propitiatory ceremonies connected with the court
and the state.”
Prof. Reginald Le May
wrote: “The beginnings of Indian colonization overseas eastward go back a very
long way in time and it is almost certain that the results seen today were, in
the main, not achieved by military expeditions, but by peaceful trading and
religious teaching – and thereby all the more permanent.”
(source:
Greater
India - By Arun Bhattacharjee -
Munshiram
Manoharlal Publishers Private Limited, 1981, New Delhi p. 1 - 20).
Modern
historical research on Southeast Asia is in its formative stages and the
attention given to its ancient past has been much less than that given to later
periods. Western scholars are mainly stimulated by their colonial involvement in
the area and generally concentrate attention on their own activities. An idea of
the extent of knowledge about Southeast Asia may be gained from an European
scholar who wrote in 1861, that except for Burma, "the Indian countries
situated beyond the Ganges hardly deserve the attention of historians."
(source: Cited in George Coedes, Journal of South
East Asian History, September, 1964, p. 4).
"A
people with no long cultural history of their own (like the British) could not
be expected to be attracted by the ancient cultural past of the people they
dominated. Equally strange is the attitude of Indian historians towards the
cultural past of Southeast Asia. Most of them have remained indifferent, largely
because of inheriting a set system of academic training. The eastward expansion
of Hindu civilization has not yet been fully traced. On
the other hand, some non-Indian scholars, especially modern writers of secondary
works, tend to play down India's importance in the evolution of southeast Asian
civilization."
(source: India and World Civilization - By D. P. Singhal
p. 80-98).
The advent of Indians in Southeast Asia
has hardly a parallel in history. It cannot be equated with the arrival of
Europeans in America, because the Indians did not go to Southeast Asia as
strangers. In view of the ethnic affinities between the prehistoric
Austro-Asiatic races of India and those of Suvarnabhumi, contact between the two
regions may well go back to the remotest antiquity. Whatever the relationship
between the two regions may be the transplantation of Indian culture into
Southeast Asia began in prehistoric times with trade contacts.

His chariot
drawn by prancing horse, Surya, the sun god rides the sky to a chorus of
worshippers.
For
more refer to chapters on Sacred
Angkor
and Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XIX.
***
"This was the time of the great
Indian expansion, when seafaring merchants fanned out across the Indian Ocean
and brought to Southeast Asia a seething ferment of new ideas. From Burma to
Indonesia, they established a chain of settlements along the coasts from which
they traded for gold, precious stones, perfumes, and spices. The merchants
brought with them their religion, Hinduism and Buddhism, their literary
language, Sanskrit, their art and technology; and their science and
mathematics."
(source:
Splendors
of the Past: Lost Cities of the Ancient World - National
Geographic Society. p.186-190).
Indian culture,
secular and religious, had found a permanent home in Southeast Asia. This was a
peaceful process; unlike the Western newcomers in modern times, no forced
colonization occurred.
"Seldom has the world seen such a protracted and pervasive
cultural diffusion. It stands a monument to the vitality and magnetism of Indian
civilization."
(source:
A
History of World Societies - By Mackay Hill Buckler
p.318-319).
Indian culture penetrated the
countries of South-East Asia entirely by peaceful means. This was the result of
a series of enterprises by traders, adventurers, scholars and priests. Operating
from Indian settlements that had been founded in the 1st century, these men
brought the highly refined culture of India to
peoples whose way of life was perfectly suited to Brahmanic and Buddhist
teachings. Throughout this area Indianization took the form of the adoption of
Sanskrit as the official and sacred language, the introduction of the Indian
religions of Brahmanism and Buddhism, with their myths, philosophical systems
and traditions and the establishment of a political structure very close to that
of ancient India.
(source: The
Oriental World
- By Jeannine Auboyer
Landmarks of World's Art quoted from Appendix page).
The
Ramayana reveals some knowledge of the eastern regions beyond the seas; for
instance Sugriva dispatched his men to Yavadvipa, the island of Java or Sumatra,
in search of Sita. It speaks of Burma as the land of silver mines. Tamil
literature contains references to tall roomy ships laden with goods returning
from eastern ports. Puranic cosmology and geographical divisions into varshas
and dvipas point to Indian knowledge of this area, although the knowledge of the
Puranic compilers was somewhat vague. Lord Ganesha
is found in Thai art especially around Sukhothai in central Thailand and Khmer
art of Cambodia. There are also spectacular images coming from Myanmar,
Malaysia, Laos and Vietnam - with both Buddhism and Hinduism intertwined and
Ganesha appearing predominantly as a protector and guardian. Nowhere
in South-East Asia is Ganesha as popular as in Indonesia: with most of Java and
Bali islands carrying forward continued worship of Ganesha. There are some rare
Ganesha bronzes as Vinayaka in Japan and some in China.
Ganesha
has been a major deity, since the seventh and eighth centuries, in Thailand,
Cambodia and Vietnam. It was Ganesha in his role as
remover of obstacles that was primarily accepted in mainland Southest Asia.
Even today in Buddhist Thailand, Ganesha is regarded as god of success. It is
from Vinayaka that the old Myanmar name for Ganesha, Mahapinary
purha, was derived. Other names with a similar meaning occur frequently in
Cambodian inscriptions, such as Vighnesha and Vignesvara, both of
which mean "Lord of removing obstacles". Ganesha was extremely popular
in the art of Indonesian islands, especially of Sumatra and Java and compare
favorably with the eighth-century Ellora caves, in images, style and
iconography. At Candi Sukuh in central Java,
a remarkable fifteenth century relief shows three figures, with a dancing
Ganesha in the centre.
There are paintings and stone sculptures of the deity
found in China, apart
from the textual references to Ganesha in the Chinese Buddhist canon. In Japan,
there is the Shingon ritual practice that centres
on Ganesha, with texts tracing back to China. Nearer India, the
assimilation of the deity with the Buddhist images is almost complete in Tibet
and Nepal. In the Tibetan Buddhism, the practice associated with Ganesha, as
Buddhist Tantric deity, survives up to this day. In Jainism Ganesha occasionally
found a place alongside Mahabir. The
Tibetan Ganesha appears, besides bronzes, in the resplendent Thangka paintings
alongside the Buddha. In a single Kathmandu valley of Nepal, there are four
principal manifestations of "Binayak" in a protective role: Ashok,
Surya, Chandra and Bighna. In that valley, Ganapati guards the Buddhist viharas
where bhajans are sung in his praise.
Ganesha
is a vibrant presence whose benediction is sought by traders, travelers, artists
and statesmen. As lord of business and diplomacy, he sits comfortably on a high
pedestal outside Bangkok's World Trade Centre, where people offer flowers,
incense and a reverential sawasdee. A gilt Ganesha presides over the bustling
charivari of lucrative tourism in the lobby of the Rama Hotel. Another commands
the Isetan department store. Even Muslim Indonesia
reveres him and European scholars call him the 'Indonesian god of wisdom'. Bandung
boasts a Jalan Ganesa, and his image adorns 20,000 rupiah notes.

Lord Ganesha supported by figures of
gana. Ganesha literally means "Lord of the Gana".
(source: Ganesha:
Dominating Oriental Psyche - By Utpal
K. Banerjee Tour
India May 2001 and straitstimes.com).
***
The Niddesa enumerates a series of
Sanskrit or Sanskritized toponyms whose identification with localities in
Southeast Asia has been proposed by French scholar, Sylvain Levi.
References are found in the Buddhist Jataka and the third Buddhist Sangiti council held at Pataliputra in 247 B.C.
during the reign of Asoka. Accounts of sea voyages, some of which ended in
disaster, are also recounted in other ancient texts, such as the Kathakosa, and
the Jain Jnatadharmakatha. The Kathakosa tells the story of Nagadutta who went
to Suvarnabhumi with five hundred ships to conduct a profitable trade. There
also numerous references in the Arthasashtra to those lands and places in
eastern and Southeast Asia, which were worthy of note from the economic,
commercial, or political viewpoint. For instance, it refers to a kind of
sandalwood, called Tailaparnika, which was produced in Suvarnabhumi.
(source: India
and World Civilization - By D. P. Singhal p.
80-98).
India's
contact by sea with China would also imply Indian contact with Southeast Asia.
All the Indian colonies were situated between two great countries and two great
civilizations - India and China. Some of them, on the Asiatic mainland, others
were on the direct trade route between India and China. Thus they were
influenced by both, religion and art came from India, and philosophy of life
came from China.
Sir John Malcolm wrote :
"Indian vessels "are so admirably adapted to
the purpose for which they are required that, not withstanding their superior science,
Europeans were unable, during an intercourse with India for two centuries, to suggest or
at least to bring into successful practice one improvement. "
It was also known that in the third century a transport of horses, which would require
large ships, reached Malaya and Southeast Asia.
In 1949, two scholars, Gordon
Ekholm and Chaman Lal,
systematically compared the Mayan, Aztec, Incan and North American Indian
civilizations with the Hindu-oriented countries. According to them, the emigrant
cultures of India took with them India's system of time measurement, local gods,
and customs.
(For more details, please refer to the chapter India
on Pacific Waves ) Gene
Matlock, author of India
Once Ruled the Americas!
states: The people of India have long known that their ancestors once sailed
to and settled in the Americas. They called America 'Patala,' The Underworld,'
not because they believed it to be underground, but because the other side of
the globe appeared to be straight down."
Even in Cambodia and in the mighty remains of Angkor the only
artistic influence that can be detected is from India. But Indian art was
flexible and adaptable and in each country it flowered afresh in many new ways,
always retaining that basic impress which it derived from India.
Sir John
Marshall, discoverer of the Indus Valley,
has referred to "the amazingly vital and flexible character of
Indian art." Indian art derives its basic character from certain ideals
associated with the religion and philosophic outlook of India. Dr. Ananda Coomaraswamy,
late curator at the Boston Museum, has said: " A more conscious of
sophisticated art could scarcely be imagined. Despite its invariably religious
subject matter, it is an art of "great courts charming the mind by their
noble matter, this is an art of "great courts charming the mind by their
noble routine."
(source: India Discovered -
By John Keay p. 162).
That Indian traders and settlers repeatedly undertook journeys to Southeast
Asia, despite the hazards and perils involved, speaks well for their physical
prowess, courage, and determination, even if allowance for the pull of profit is
made. Not only were the Indian traders vehicles of culture in this part of the
world, but everywhere trade has been a major factor in dissemination of culture.
Arthur Waley,
author of the book, The
Way and its Power, has declared that merchants were undoubtedly the main carriers of information
about the outside world, and disputes the assertion which is derived from false
analogy between the East and West that merchants are not likely to have been
interested in philosophy. Indian or Chinese merchants, in contrast to European
traders, were "reputedly capable of discussing metaphysical questions"
and there is ample testimony in Buddhist legend of such merchants.
"Each
blade of grass here breathes of Indian culture"- said Jawaharlal
Nehru, during his visit to Cambodia in1954 to commemorate the 2500th
birth anniversary of Buddha.
India, as
Jawaharlal Nehru observed way back in 1954, continues to breathe in these parts.
Lao religion is guided by both Hindu and Buddhist influences; the prevalent
language here has Sanskrit and Pali roots; Laos has evolved Ramayana Ballet like
an institution; ancient shivalingams were discovered in the south of Laos in
1999; Laotians greet their elders with a nop similar to the Indian namaste; they
take their shoes off outside their homes; temples in the ancient Laotian Capital
of Luang Prabang bear distinct Indian influences. All this and much more remain
literally miles away from the collective Indian consciousness. Similarly, the
ancient complex of Angkor Wat in Cambodia, rediscovered in the 1940s, is an
incredible testimony to the reach of Hindu religion and culture way back in the
12th century. The massive temple complex dedicated to Vishnu and bearing
frescoes from the Ramayana and the Mahabharata and detailed scenes of Samudramanthan
tells the story of a time when despite transport handicaps Indians traveled to
distant shores and placed their indelible signature on a civilization that
breathes to this day. That these great civilizations of the Mekong River (Mekong
is said to be a derivative for Ma Ganga) have kept alive a great Indian heritage
is a little-acknowledged fact in India, except of course their lifeless
documentation in Government records and academic research.
(source:
South
East Asia, truly India - By D. Ganguly - dailypioneer.com).

Ancient Indian
ocean-going ship arriving at Java, from a frieze of the Borobodur stupa.
For
more refer to chapters on Sacred
Angkor
and Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XIX.
***
The discovery of monsoon made sea journeys between India and the Western
world safe and punctual, and the Roman demand for the luxury goods of the East
had reached fantastic proportions - far beyond what India alone could supply.
Consequently, the Indians went in increasing numbers to Southeast Asia looking
for those things that could be sold to the Romans at such good prices that Pliny
the Elder was to bewail this loss of blood inflicted to the Roman economy.
(source: India
and World Civilization - By D. P. Singhal p.
80-98).
In the beginning of the Christian era,
India lost Siberia as her most important source of gold, because political
upheavals and large-scale movements of the people of Central Asia in the last
two centuries B.C. cut off the trade route.
In Indonesia, Hinduism arrived first, but
it was made no conscious attempt to convert local peoples to their faith or
culture. They certainly did not impose it by force. Proselytism was precluded by
the very nature of the Hindu faith, which explains the general unconcern of
Indians with the Indianization of Southeast Asia. However, later Buddhist
missionaries worked for the spread of their faith. In some countries, like
Indonesia, Hinduism was intermingled with Buddhism, that Shiva and the Buddha
were described as brothers! Indeed, in Balinese temples where the religion is
Balinese Hinduism, Saiva and Buddhist priest sit side by side, although dressed
differently, as they bless the laity.
Even the
remarkable Hellenization of
the Mediterranean world does not compare with the Indianization of Southeast
Asia.
India was far from Southeast Asia.
There were far fewer Indians in Southeast Asia
than Greeks in the Hellenistic world, and those Indians had to contend with an
equally powerful Chinese civilization in an area mainly frequented by Chinese.
On the other hand, Greek civilization did not confront such a contrast of
cultural and ethnic types.
There is nothing in the Hellenistic world to compare with the Angkor Wat or
Borubudur. In addition, India contributed not only philosophy and thought, but
also a religion that still survives in most areas of Southeast Asia. Greek
religion is a thing of the past.
(source: India
and World Civilization - By D. P. Singhal p.
80-98).
The Hindu kingdoms that rose in
South-East Asia had no political connection with the mother country. Their
inscriptions are in Sanskrit hardly differing from those of any Indian States.
The Hindu epics and puranas still contribute to the themes for the theatre,
dances, and shadow plays and the marionette shows of Malaya and Java. The
influence of the Dharmasastras and the Arthasastra on the polity of these lands
is clearly traceable. Their languages have been enriched by contact with
Sanskrit. The scripts of all their languages are adaptations of Indian writing.
The kings performed vedic sacrifices; they used the Saka era and the lunar-solar
calendar. Tangible results of ancient Indian contact may be seen in their
monuments and temples. Till very recently at Phnom Penh in Cambodia and at
Bangkok in Siam brahmins of a very mixed descent followed Buddhism and wore the
sikha and upavita, and worshipped an assortment of Hindu and Buddhist
images.
Kambuja (Cambodia) according to
tradition was established by Kambu Svayambhuva after whom the country was named
Kambuja. Some of its famous rulers bore names ending in Varman as in South
Indian; examples are Jayavarman, Yasovarman, and Suryavarman. The law books of
Siam (Thailand) were framed on the basis of the Hindu dharmasastras and the
temples of its capital, Bangkok, were adorned with sculptures depicting scenes
from the Ramayana.
The peaceful and sympathetic methods
of Hindu colonists were in striking contrast to the Chinese policy of conquest
and annexation and to the severity and exploitation inherent in modern western
colonization.
(source: Advanced
History of India - By Nilakanta Sastri and G. Srinivasachari
p.231-233).
Reginald S. Le
May (1885 - )
author of The
culture of South-East Asia; the heritage of India
has observed:
"India, indeed,
began to exercise a profound cultural influence on her neighbors to the eastward
- Burma, Siam, Malaya, Cambodia, Java and Sri Lanka all falling beneath her
sway. And this, as far as one can may judge, almost entirely as a result of
trading and peaceful penetration by missionaries, merchants and others, and not
by force of arms." "The beginnings of Indian colonization overseas
eastward go back a very long way in time and it is almost certain that the
results seen today were, in the main, not
achieved by military expedition, but by peaceful trading and religious teaching
- and thereby all the more permanent."
Contrasting the
Indian method with the Chinese
he remarked:
"Indian
religious art and culture seem naturally to have exercised an extraordinary
fascination over the indigenous peoples
of all these territories,
no doubt, owing to the attractions offered by Hinduism and Buddhism, while
Chinese art, not bearing any particular religious message, apparently made
little impression, in spite of the fact that the Chinese, too, sailed to
southern seas..."
(source: India
and The World - By Buddha Prakash
p. 7-8 Institute of Indic Studies Kurukshetra University 1964).
For
more refer to chapter on Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XV.
Top
of Page
Champa/Angadvipa on the coast of Annam
- Vietnam
Champa is the remotest colony in the East
and was less known than Kamboja and Java. According to Sir Charles Eliot,
the Hindu dynasty of Champa was founded between 150 and 200 A.D. The conquerors
were known as the Chams
and hence the country came to be known as Champa. Vietnam, figures
prominently as a stepping stone in the story of India's cultural expansion to
the Americas.
According to historian Dr. K. P. Jayaswal,
"The State of Champa, according the Chinese authorities was founded in 137
A. D.
Champa seems to have been mentioned under the name Angadvipa
by the Vayu Purana.
Again, Champa was probably the earliest colony, it being a key to the Chinese
trade and the point from the islands of Java and Borneo are easily
accessible." It maintained close relations with Funan, a fact which must
have been largely responsible for the penetration of Indian influence there.
A
Hindu dynasty was founded by Sri Mara in the second century A.D. A successor to
Sri Mara was the famous king called Bhadravarma.
He ruled over the Northern and Central portions of the kingdom comprising the
provinces of Amravati and Vijaya and possibly also the Southern province of
Panduranga. His greatest contribution was to Hindu culture was the building of
the temple of Bhadresvarasvamin (Shiva) at Myson which became the national
shrine of the Chams.
It is said that Bhadravarman abdicated his throne to spend
his last days on the banks of the river Ganges. This was followed by two
dynasties - the Panduranga
dynasty (757-860) and later by the Bhrigu
dynasty (860-985).
Champa passed through various dynasties and war with China
continued in the 3rd and 4th century. This was a period of political unrest in
China, and which gave Champa the opportunity to expand into Chinese territory.
Shiva and Vishnu were worshipped by various names. Goddess Laxmi was known
as Padma or Sri.
As
regards to literature, Sanskrit was the language of the learned. It was also the
official language of the country. Many kings of Champa were Sanskrit scholars.
Brahmi script was used in inscriptions.
The books were in use were the Vedas,
Sastras, the Epics, Buddhist philosophy, Saivism, Vaisnavism, Panini's grammar
along with its commentary, Dharmasastras of Manu and Narada, the Puranas and
classical Sanskrit literature including prose and Kavya literature.
Vietnam's Siva
Lingams
VIietnam,
June 23, 2001: A Siva Lingam monument, a relic from the lost Champa Kingdom,
stands proudly at the My Son site in Vietnam. Statues
depicting Lingam and Yoni can be found in Hindu-influenced cultures across the
entire Asian region. But the Cham religion in Vietnam has taken these
images and fashioned them into a distinctive and different form.
Lingam
and Yoni in the Cham religion differ from their Indian progenitors and their
presence in Vietnam is evidence of the profound influence of Indian culture and
religion in the country.
It is also proof of the strong
sense of identity of the Cham people, who borrowed from Hinduism and created
statues and temples with a style all of their own.
Cham Linga
sculptures generally have a flat top, with only a few featuring spherical
shapes. they are generally found in three different styles: square; another in
two parts, one cylindrical and one square; and another has a cylindrical upper,
the middle is octagonal and the bottom is square. Linga and Yoni are usually
constructed as one structure. Traditionally only one Linga is attached to the
Yoni, but in some Cham sculptures many Linga can be found on a single Yoni
platform. The differences between Cham sculptures and those found else where in
the Hindu world demonstrate subtle changes from their origins.
(source:
Giving new
image and likeness to old beliefs - by
Nguyen Van Ngoc
http://vietnamnews.vnagency.com.vn/2001-06/23/Stories/29.htm).
For
more information on Vietnam refer to chapter on Glimpses
XIV
Top
of Page
Indonesia
Java or Yavadvipa
Sir Stamford Raffles
(1781-1826) the British Governor of Java,
in his book, History
of Java, II, p. 87, wrote:
“In the year 525 Saka era – 603 A.D., it being foretold
to a king of Gujarat that his country would decay and go to ruin, he resolved to
send his son to Java. He embarked with about 5000 followers in 6 large and about
100 small vessels, and after a voyage of four months reached an island they
supposed to be Java; but finding themselves mistaken, re-embarked, and finally
settled at Matarem, in the center of the island they were seeking….The prince
then found that men alone were wanting to make a great and flourishing state. He
accordingly applied to Gujarat for assistance, when his father, delighted at his
success, sent him reinforcement of 2000 people…From this period Java was known
and celebrated as a kingdom; an extensive commerce was carried on with Gujarat
and other countries, and the bay of Matarem was filled with adventurers from all
parts.”
(source:
Periplus of the Erythrean Sea - W.H. Schoff p.
245).
There is an Indian tradition at that
"those who go to Java do not come back." There are many views
regarding the beginnings of Hindu colonization of Java. One view connects the
original colonies under their leader called Ajisaka with the heroes of the
Mahabharata and Astina or Hastinapura. Another view traces the colonization to
Gujarat. The third view traces it to Kalinga (Orissa) from where "twenty
thousand families were sent to Java by the prince of Kalinga." The Javanese
era started by Ajisaka starts from 78 A.D. which is also the beginning of the
Saka era of India. According to historian, R. C.
Majumdar, "The Indian settlement in Java
dates from the 2nd century A.D. if not earlier, and the Hindu culture flourished
there till the end of 15th century.
Fa-hien,
the Chinese traveler, visited Java on his way to China in about 418 A.D. He
tells that there was no Buddhism only Hinduism in Java. The name Java is taken
from the Sanskrit word Yava.
The kings of Java had their names which ended with Varman.
There were several kingdoms in Java. Four
Sanskrit inscriptions have been found me in Western Java mention a king named Purna-varmarn.
One of them calls his grandfather Rajarishi and another ancestor his father Rajadhiraja. The latter is said to have dug the Chandrabhaga which reached the
sea after passing by the capital city. Purna-varman himself dug a similar canal
called the Gomati river. Purna-varman ruled in the sixth century A.D. and his
capital was known as Taruma.

Shiva Maheshvara - Java.
For
more refer to chapters on Sacred
Angkor
and Glimpses
XII to
Glimpses XIX.
***
Both Hinduism and Buddhism flourished
here. We find worship of Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma in the temples. Grants of land
were made to the priests. Images of Mahadevi and Durga have been also found.
Literature was mainly theological. We have the Arjuna-vivaha, poetic rendering
of the Bharat-yuddha from the Mahabharata, Kavi Ramayana, Vritta Sanchaya.
The temple of Java are a standing
monuments of the influence exercised by Indian thought and art in moulding the
development of the entire art of Java. The monumental history begins in Central
Java, with the Chandi (temple) Punta Deva, Bhima, Sri Khanda, Pawon and Arjuna.
Shiva temple of Chandi Bayon near Borobudur. Superb images of Vishnu, Shiva,
Brahma, Ganesh, and Agastya Siva-guru have been found from there. The best
temples at Prambanam are known as Chandi Loro Jauggrang. These are considered
the greatest Hindu monuments of Java.

Indic
Influence is South east Asia: Chandi Sukuh Hindu Temple dedicated to Bhima of
Mahabharata in Indonesia strikes a disquieting alien chord with its flat topped
step pyramid and its Mayan calendar carvings.
In
general layout, the temple conforms to the plan of most other Hindu temples.
There are three precincts, consisting of three concentric terraces. However,
where most temples would have a large square shrine, Chandi
Sukuh has a pyramid reminiscent of Mayan structures from
Central America
.
The
religious structures in Java are commonly called Chandis, a term which
originally meant a commemorative building.
For
more refer to chapter on India on Pacific Waves
and Seafaring
in Ancient India.
***
The worship of Rishi
Agastya, the sage responsible for the diffusion of Hindu culture in
Java, the frequent occurrence of Ganesha images, the organization of rural
economy and village administration, the shadow and puppet plays and Vedic hymns
and rituals of Bali, all point to the extension of Indian religious and cultural
influences of these islands. A statue of Agastya is
found at Candi Banon - early 9th century Batavia)
(source: The
Indians And The Amerindians - By Dr. B. Chakravarti. Self-Employment
Bureau Publication Calcutta p. 32)
Prambanan - slender and ethereal Hindu
temples
Built
in the 10th century, this is the largest Shiva
compound in Indonesia. Rising above the center of the last of these concentric
squares are three temples decorated in relief illustrating the epic of the
Ramayana, dedicated to the three great Hindu divinities (Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu)
and three temples dedicated to the animals who serve them. The Prambanan
temple,
which was dedicated to Lord Shiva, was started in 856 AD and completed in 900 AD
by King Daksa. Earlier Shiva temples were built in 675 AD on the Dieng mountain
range, southwest of Medang Kamolan, the capital of the Mataram Kingdom.
Dr. Ananda Coomarswamy,
late curator at the Boston Museum, was of the opinion that
"the Prambanam reliefs are, if anything,
superior to those of Borobudur and certainly more dramatically conceived. "
Of the sculptures in Prambanum, Sir
Stamford Raffles
(1781-1826) the British Governor of Java
and author of History
of Java says:
"In the whole course of my life
I have never met with such stupendous and finished
specimens of human labor, and of the science and taste of ages long
since forgot, crowded together in small a compass as in this little spot."
(source: History
of Java. volume II p. 15).
The Indonesian Ramayana
The archaeological evidence of the Rama story in Indonesia
dates back to the ninth century AD, the period of the |