a r t i c l e s    o n    c o n v e r s i o n

Christian provocation
By  Jon Stock
The Spectator,  February 6, 1999

(The author is India correspondent (New Delhi) of the Daily Telegraph)
Put simply, the Indian subcontinent has become the principal target for a wide range of Western Christian missions which are determined to spread the gospel to India’s ‘unreached’ people before the year 2000.This they call their ‘Great Commission’.  The more extreme among them are motivated by an eschatological belief, that the new millennium will herald Christ’s Second Coming, and by a sense of frustration that a country of almost 980 million people can boast barely 20 million Christians...

***

The recent spate of attacks on Christians in India, culminating in the grotesque incineration of an Australian missionary and his two sons in their jeep in the eastern state of Orissa, has led many Western observer to believe that in has finally abandoned its constitutionally enshrined policy of secularism.  Certainly the Hindu militants who are behind the attacks have little truck with Mahatma Gandhi’s once sacred traditions of religious tolerance and pluralism.  Anyone who could stand and watch two boys under ten and their father fight to get out of a burning vehicle, only to push them back into the flames every time they tried to escape, is as far removed from the Mahatma as is humanly possible.  But what seems to have been ignored by Western governments and their missions in New Delhi, as they bleat about India’s growing religious intolerance, is the extreme intolerance of the evangelical, mostly American, missionaries who are now working in India.

It should first be stated that India’s various Hindu fundamentalist organisations, known collectively as the Sangh Parivar, or right-wing family, are not a pretty bunch.  At the semi-respectable political end is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which heads the coalition government in India.  But at the other there are some fanatical, sinister pressure groups such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), which means ‘World Council of Hindus’, many of whose members are little more than thugs.

But one is forced to sympathise with the fundamentalist’s view, if not his tactics, in the current dispute with the Christian Church.  The Sangh Parivar’s principal objection is to the conversion of India’s tribal, mostly Hindu, population by foreign-funded Christian missionaries who, they say, bribe it with promises of better education, health and an escape from the bottom of the caste system.  The Sangh Parivar has its own particular, somewhat skewed objections to these conversions - it sees them as a direct challenge to its radical goal of a Hindu Rashtra, or Hindu nation - but Western governments should also be concerned about them and what exactly these missionaries are doing in India. One suspects they have no idea.

Put simply, the Indian subcontinent has become the principal target for a wide range of Western Christian missions which are determined to spread the gospel to India’s ‘unreached’ people before the year 2000.This they call their ‘Great Commission’.  The more extreme among them are motivated by an eschatological belief, that the new millennium will herald Christ’s Second Coming, and by a sense of frustration that a country of almost 980 million people can boast barely 20 million Christians.   Consider the following statement from a Colorado-based group of worldwide Christian missions calling itself AD 2000 and Beyond:

‘Flashes of light’ seen all around the North India-Hindi Belt, particularly among the tribal groups, are encouraging us to believe that the Sun of Righteousness is indeed ready to rise upon these unreached peoples.  The hundreds of strategies leading to the year 2000, the rise of national ministries in India, the increase in church-planting efforts and the focus on reaching every people groups all lead us to believe that something wonderful is indeed looming on the horizon for India.

Less obsessed with the millennium., the Gospel Missions of India, in Michigan, talks of ‘winning India for Christ’.  The Washington-based Mission of Joy, which claims to have helped more than 13,000 Hindus and Muslims commit to Christ, says, ‘India is ripe for harvest.’

Evangelising India for Christ, in South Carolina, says it all in its name.
All these organisation s have learnt to accommodate post-independence India’s uneasiness about Western missionaries. The government in Delhi no longer issues them with long-term visas, so they focus instead on training and supporting indigenous pastors, on channelling funds and resources to India, and on prayer.  The last of these might sound the most innocuous but the sort of prayers that are currently being mouthed in America go a long way to explain why Hindu fundamentalist s in India feel threatened.

Take the Bethany Wo rld Prayer Center in Louisiana, which has produced ‘prayer profiles’ for the numerous different ethic groupings of non-believers that exist in India.  These profiles help members world-wide to concentrate on something more tangible that just a name. Anyone who wants to pray for the Ho tribals of south Bihar and northern Orissa, for example, is given a photo, a detailed map and a description of their day-to-day lives and beliefs (30 per cent Hindu, 60 per cent animist).  They are then told to do the following: ‘Pray against the spirits of animism and Hinduism that have kept, the Ho in spiritual darkness for centuries.’

At the heart of India’s cherished secularism - and indeed at the heart of Hinduism - lies a respect for other people’s religions.  Bethany’s exhortation to pray ‘against animism and Hinduism’ is hardly a mark of respect.  In its information package about India, it goes on to describe the four states of India’s tribal belt as the heartland of Hinduism and the home of India’s most deprived people.  ‘Interestingly, the acronym of their names - BI for Bihar, MA for Madhya Pradesh, R for Rajasthan and U for Uttar Pradesh - is the Hindi word for ‘bimaru’, which actually means “sick”.’  The message is implicit but clear.  Hinduism is as sick as its impoverished followers.  The Native Missionary Movement of India, based in Tennessee, is more explicit in its description of Orissa:

‘Satan has successfully camouflaged his grip on the people of Orissa with a thin veneer of religion.’  As for AD 2000 and   Beyond, it points out that Varanasi, Hinduism’s holiest city, is full of temples dedicated to Shiva, ‘an idol whose symbol is a phallus.  Many consider the city the very seat of Satan.’

There is little doubt that the current communal tension in India would not be se serious of foreign-funded missionaries had been content with giving Indians the choice of Christianity and left it at that.  Instead,many of them (though not all) have declared war against Hinduism in their desire to convert the nation to Christianity.  It is this that has so piqued the Hindu militants.  Speaking about Mother Teresa, Mr. Ashok Singhal, leader of the VHP, recently accused her of being part of an international conspiracy to eliminate Hinduism from India.  (He accused ‘Teresa’ - he can’t bring herself to call her Mother - of threatening Hindus with lethal injections if they did not convert.)  Talk of conspiracies it far-fetched, but this otherwise unhinged man has a point.  

Hundreds of thousands of dollars are being channeled into India through well-organised, American-based evangelical missions.  The meticulously researched ethnographic data that they are compiling on the region ensures that funds (as well as prayers) are being directed with military precision to the right area, even to specific pin codes in remote tribal districts.  ‘God is allowing us to “spy out the land” that we might go in and claim both it and its inhabitants for Him,’ says AD 2000 and Beyond.

Sadly, Hindu militants have not helped their own cause.  They have responded to the missionaries’ zeal with conversions of their own, most notably among the Adivasi tribals of Gujarat, and now also with sickening violence.  The crusading instinct does not sit easily with Hinduism.  (Once, in the 9th century, Hinduism dedicated itself to forced conversions, when Shankara Acharya led a militant assault on Buddhism in the south of India, but such instances are rare.)  Nor does the burning alive of an Australian missionary, Graham Staines, who had spent more than 30 years trying to eliminate leprosy from Orissa.  Those who say that the more extreme members of the Sangh Parivar have little to do with genuine Hinduism have a point.  But then, it could be equally argued that America’s evangelical missionaries have little to do with religious tolerance.

 

 

Copyright © 2001 - All Rights Reserved.

a r t i c l e s    o n    c o n v e r s i o n