a r t i c l e s    o n    c o n v e r s i o n

Secularism or anti-Hinduism?
By K. Venkatasubramanian
http://www.pragna.org/Iss01212.html

Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee is an intellectual with a rare sense  of humour.  When  he  addressed  a Delhi  conference,  recently,  in English, a member of the press corps said it was ironic that  Mr. Vajpayee  should  have addressed the United Nations  Organisation Summit in Hindi and a meet at home in English. Pat came the Prime Minister's  reply. "It is safer to talk in Hindi in America  than it  is  in  Delhi." This is a clear example of the contradictions existing in the country.

An atomic scientist, when the first nuclear explosion took place, could  recite from the Bhagavad Gita without anyone raising their eyebrows  but  the  people  in India  cannot  render  a  hymn  on Saraswathi, Goddess of learning, at an education meet.

When  I  tune into the FM channel at 5 a.m., it is a pleasure  to hear   Sheik  Chinna  Moula  Sahib's  "Mahaganapathim"   on   the nagaswaram. How can a devout Muslim render a song on a Hindu God? Does it mean the artiste is pro-Hindutva?

It  is  time  our political leaders understood that Hindutva  and Hindu culture are two different things.

Indian   culture  is  imbibed  by  all   Indian   citizens, irrespective of caste, creed, colour, religion and sex.  Quite  a few  churches conduct car festivals and the image of Mother  Mary is  taken  around  in a procession. Many Hindus  follow  the  car religiously. Nagaswaram is a 'must' in a Hindu marriage.  Muslims can be seen at the Palani Temple and Hindus at the Nagore Dargah.

When,  in college, I got the first rank in Biblical studies,  the Paramacharya congratulated me and did not banish me.

As Director of Education, Tamil Nadu, when I was asked to preside over  a wedding where the bride was a Hindu and the groom a pious Christian,  the  Bible was read first and the pastor  rendered  a prayer song and then the Hindu priest took over with the mantras; the  mangalasutra was tied and rings were exchanged. Everyone was happy, when cakes and jalebis were served together.  Fortunately, no  Minister  attended this wedding. Maybe he would have  walked out.

If politicians leave people alone, things will definitely improve and the country will grow into a global power.

Secularism  has been interpreted by the power-hungry  politicians as atheism. It is not so. It is only harmony among the religions. In  fact, Hinduism is the most secular religion in the world. You can  be only born a Hindu because it never encourages conversion. It was this religion that Swami Vivekananda re-established as the most universal and receptive.

It  is convenient for the politician to abolish the moral code of conduct  which the religions preached. By playing atheist,  these people, who are after power and pelf could open the floodgates of corruption  without  any inhibition. But the anti-god  propaganda had  miserably failed and so these political 'Rasputins' now take refuge in pseudo-secularism.

Many would be aware that Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose organised a  dharna  in  a  Calcutta college stressing  the  right  of  the students  to  observe  Saraswathi puja.   Students  of  different castes and religions took part in the dharna.

Swami  Vivekananda  wrote  to his follower,  Sri  Ala  Singa  of Madras,  from Chicago on November 2, 1897, about his  address  at the Parliament of Religions: "I bowed down to Devi Saraswathi and stepped up to speak."

He began all his letters with "Victory to God," "Shri Durga be my Refuge,"  "Salutation  to  Bhagawan  Ramakrishna."  He  asked   key questions to solve the eternal Indian crisis. Why do Indians lack the power of collective action? How will the country's future  be saved,  if  these  defects  in  the national  character  are  not remedied?

The  answer  lies in making every boy and girl learn his  or  her Indian  moorings.  We  should  have  Indian  education.   It   is unfortunate  that  we  have  Tamil Education,  Kerala  Education, Punjab  Education and so on. To revel in this mess even after  50 years of independence is really regrettable.

When everyone talks of integration and secularism, they mean only fostering their own narrow loyalties.

Every  Christian  school starts with the Bible for  all  students irrespective of class, creed or religion.  Everyone accepts it as part  of our secular ideal. But when Hindus sing devotional songs at  a public function, conscientious objection is raised even  by non-believers like the Communists.

When  M. F. Husain drew a portrait of Goddess Saraswathi  in  the nude he was hailed as the most secular painter in Asia.

If you go through the telephone directory, you find such names as Kamakshi  Kabir, Helen Meenakshi, Lakshmi Satyavathi and  Vincent Saraswathi.  This is real integration.

What  is integration? It is acceptance. Swami Vivekananda  chides those  who say, "We tolerate other religions." He says they  must accept them.

What  is  needed  in our education system is this acceptance.  We must learn to accept and respect other's views, then only can  we live together as a big family.

Mahatma Gandhi chanted prayers from all religions but thought the essence of India's culture was captured in the song, "Vaishnava  Janato". To recite songs on Hindu Gods and  Goddesses can never be a crime in India.

In  the  West  Asian  countries, only Islam is  recognised.  Even having pictures of leaders of other religions, leave alone  Gods, is considered a crime and people are imprisoned for that.

One  of  my close friends, a well-known educational thinker,  who passed  away  recently in Karnataka, lamented  that,  "Things  are going  beyond  control  and  there  is  no  discipline."  He  was referring  to  the  recent  nation-wide teacher's  strike.  "When students  have given up strike, teachers have taken it  up.  Only the  fear  of  God can bring in discipline but we have  dispensed with God," he said.

Gunnar  Myrdal  was perfectly right when he said,  "Indians  have everything  except  discipline." The  world  takes  lessons  from India,  but we in India refuse to learn anything from our culture in the name of secularism.

"If  one  were to ask me which literature would give us back  (us Europeans,  who  have been exclusively fed  on  Greek  and  Roman thought....  )  the necessary equilibrium in order  to  make  our inner  life more perfect, more comprehensive, more universal,  in short,  more  human, a life not only for this  life,  but  for  a transformed and eternal life, once again I would indicate  India. Philosophy  in India is what it ought to be, not the  denial  but the  fulfilment of religion: It is the highest religion: and  the oldest  name  of  the  oldest system of philosophy  in  India  is Vedanta,  that is, the end, the goal, the highest object  of  the Vedas," said the German philosopher, Friedrich Max Muller.

Eminent British historian Arnold Joseph Toynbee advised: "At this supremely dangerous moment in human history (it is still so), the only  way  of  salvation is the Indian way. Emperor Ashoka's  and Mahatma  Gandhi's principle of non-violence and Sri Ramakrishna's testimony to the harmony of religions. Here we have the  attitude and  the spirit that can make it possible for the human race  to grow together into a single family..." Vasudaiva Kutumbakam.

But  do we have the patience to listen to Max Muller and Toynbee? They may not fit into our misshapen secularism.

(Courtesy The Hindu, December 1, 1998)

 

 

Copyright © 2001 - All Rights Reserved.

a r t i c l e s    o n    c o n v e r s i o n